real life cycling

Stra-vanity (part 1)

Strava

Fellow cyclists and Strava users, in case you were in any doubt, let me assure you: no-one is looking your Strava stats. They might look, but they don’t LOOK.

Truth is, they don’t care.

Don’t be offended by that fact, because you’re probably really interesting in real life, and that’s the bit that counts, right? And even if you aren’t, your personality probably still knocks spots off your stats.

I can’t be bothered with Strava as a social thing. I barely look at what anyone else is up to. When I do, it only inspires negative thoughts: “how the hell are they finding the time to do all that training”, “why aren’t they getting out and riding more, the lazy sods”, and my favourite, “hah! They still haven’t overtaken my 27th place on (insert favourite segment here…)”

Which brings me to ‘segments’; those timed sections of tarmac which are used to rank riders, and on which the entire appeal of Strava is based.

That’s an odd word, isn’t it?

Pre Strava, a segment used to be a piece of an orange. As a description of a mouthful of fruit it does the job beautifully. As a measure of cycling it’s functional and unromantic, but what else can you use?

KOM (king of the mountain) doesn’t work either. As we Strava users know, the vast majority of timed-sections-of-tarmac (ok…segments) are random stretches of nondescript road that make the average motorway bridge look like a mountain. They are nothing that deserves the bestowing of royal status.

Most of them don’t deserve kudos.

And if you are now wondering why I’m using a word predominantly uttered by skaters and BMX’ers in a west coast Amercian drawl (like…kudos, duuude!) you are clearly not a Strava user.

Kudos is Strava’s version of clicking the ‘like’ button on someone’s bike ride. Until Strava appeared on the scene back in two-thousand–and-whatever, I’m reliably informed that the word kudos hadn’t been uttered by someone from the north of England since the late 1990’s, when a disorientated lad from Wigan monumentally mispronounced the word sudoku in the magazine aisle in WHSmiths.

And now we find ourselves routinely giving our mates kudos for every 50 mile Sunday club run and 3 mile Monday commute. At the very least, Strava could add some negative feedback emoticons to allow us to express our displeasure at our friends and their sluggish progress.

And yes, they are my friends, but most of them are definitely not ‘athletes’, as Strava insists on categorising us all. That’s just vanity. Or should that be Stra-vanity? I am no more an ‘athlete’ than Wayne Rooney is. I’m a plucky amateur, at best.

You would be forgiven for thinking I’m not a fan of Strava. You’d be wrong.

I think it’s ridiculous for all these reasons. But as a tool to log my own rides, view my routes, see where I got lost, and track my progress in a less-than-serious manner against the hotshots and also-rans in my local area, I love it. I’m happy to pore over my own Strava stats, I just don’t want to pour over anyone else’s.

Oh, and while we’re at it, you know that everything on Strava is wind assisted, don’t you? You know that there are apps available that factor in the wind direction and tell you which segments to attack? You know that the leader-boards and segments and kudos only mean something if we all rode the same bit of road at the same moment under the same laboratory conditions, don’t you?

Just as long as we’re clear.

Have fun.

 

28 comments on “Stra-vanity (part 1)

  1. Now ask me why I’m not on STRAVA… Chuckle. Let’s just gloss over the fact that I’ve written a 2,000 page volume of my opinions and experience and published it… for free. Dammit.

    Oh, and I’m right with you on the whole “athletes” thing. I’m no athlete! I’m an estimator who rides a bike for fun an hour every evening, for God’s sake!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The best thing about Strava is getting back and checking the shape of your route, I recently did a ride that looked like a rabbit.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Oh I certainly DO pour over other people’s stats especially if they train/ride with power, but I’m a but of a weirdo like that.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. I agree that the social aspect could really be developed. Also there are so many people calling for wind conditions to be added it it never seems to get added. KOM Conspiracy maybe. ?

    Like

  5. I’ve actually looked at the stats of races that I’ve entered (viewing my friends on the same course), just to see what I’m up against, looking at where to hold back and which corners people attack out of. Also not all KOMs are wind assisted, at least most of mine aren’t (neither are they into a raging head wind). But there are a lot of lorry drafters out there doing 40mph uphill, that’s just not cricket.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. You’ve coined a phrase that struck a nerve. So I’ve decided to start a blog and bike/run with it. I hope you nor Strava don’t mind. Coming soon… http://stravanity.com

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Ah, but it’s fun, if taken lightly, especially for an old fogey like me.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Oh, thanks for the kudos on my latest epic ride. LOL!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Pingback: Is Chris Froome stacking shelves at Tesco? – ragtime cyclist

  10. Pingback: Death by turbo  – ragtime cyclist

  11. Pingback: The Tale of the Tapas – ragtime cyclist

  12. Pingback: We are not cyclists, we are millionaires – ragtime cyclist

  13. Pingback: A unified theory of cycling – road|THEORY

  14. Pingback: Vacancy: Dutchman wanted. Full training given. Belgians need not apply. – road|THEORY

  15. Pingback: Don’t buy upgrades, ride upgrades – road|THEORY

  16. Pingback: Egan Bernal and the Thief of Joy – road|THEORY

  17. Pingback: Feel the form and do it anyway – road|THEORY

  18. Pingback: The curious case of Richie Porte – road|THEORY

  19. Pingback: Cyclist v Doughnuts (a love story) – road|THEORY

Leave a comment