pro cycling

50 shades of grey areas

I’m quite a precise person.

In a world of chaos I like a bit of order and good grammar. I spell out my text messages correctly. I punctuate my Tweets. It’s a way of wrangling some verbal control over the world.

Imagine two self-help pieces: “How to help someone having a seizure”, and “How to help someone have a seizure”.

Same subject, different meaning. One helpful, one illegal.

It’s all about precision, and clarity. Where would we be without it?

Having said this, the world is full of nuance. Some people can’t cope with this. “I don’t do grey areas,” they say, proudly, “you know where you are with black and white.”

Which is true. You do.

But it’s just another way of saying “having no definite opinion on these hugely complicated things scares me,” or “makes me feel inadequate,” or, “makes me anxious,” or “harms my status as a person who has opinions on stuff.”

These people, in my experience, are often not fans of pro-cycling. Or if they are, they’re doing it wrong.

Because pro cycling is a sport with both rules, and etiquette. Two separate things. Both fluid.

Some rules must be strictly adhered to (no engines in bikes, for example), while others are more flexible; you can get a tow from your team car for a bit, if you’ve had a crash, or been unlucky in some other way, or are racing in your home country, unless public opinion creates a backlash, in which case you’ll be dressed down and chucked off the race.

Etiquette is equally slippery.

For example, if the wearer of the leader’s jersey crashes, the rest of the peloton wait for him, because to take advantage of a moment of bad luck isn’t the done thing. But if the leader leaps in to a field to publicly deal with a bowel movement (Tom Dumoulin in the recent Giro d’Italia), then you apparently carry on racing.

But then in the post-race interviews you deny you were racing, obviously.

Just to cover yourself in case the bowel-movement-in-a-field etiquette has changed and you didn’t get the memo.

The list of grey areas goes on. And all this stuff also goes through the filter of how popular you are as a rider, and how many favours other riders and team bosses may or may not owe you.

And then, of course, there’s doping.

I don’t want to go too deeply down that particular rabbit hole largely because I have a job to hold down and a family who I like spending time with. But you can’t ignore the fact that performance enhancement creates the biggest grey area of them all.

If you need black and white, you’re basically stuffed.

If you see an exceptional performance and instantly deride it as implausible, impossible, and performance enhanced, then you’ve just wasted five hours of your life glued to a bike race that you conclude is meaningless.

If you watch an exceptional performance and instantly proclaim it clean, beyond dispute, then if that rider turns out be a doper at some later date you’re a fool.

So the solution is to exist in the grey areas.

To watch cycling in a permanent state of uncertainty. Willing to believe what your eyes see, and equally ready to face the prospect of a subsequent positive drugs test.

Which may seem fundamentally unsatisfying, but is preferable to the spectacle of many other sports (tip: probably more so the ones where people are very well paid), where there are no drugs in the sport.

Until someone test positive, in which case they are a bad person and are punished. The rest of the competitors can then get on with competing in a sport where there are no drugs.

Until the next person tests positive.

Isn’t it better to learn to live with good, honest grey areas?

That’s how the rest of the world works.

(Image: Sylvain Elies via Flickr CC)

Click here to subscribe to weekly Ragtime Cyclist in your inbox, every Sunday

41 comments on “50 shades of grey areas

  1. Pingback: Vive le Tour: lose the battle, win the war – ragtime cyclist

  2. And that’s not all there is to remark on «grey areas» …
    I – as a graphic designer with the necessary knowledge of colours («GREY» is a clour !)
    … know, that there are two ways to produce this colour / or call it «effect»:

    One is: To dimm down the colour (?) BLACK in a certain percentage (never looks so good in print products) and
    Second is: Mixing it using the 4 basic colours that you need for any printed matter: YMCK
    (Yellow, Magenta, Cyan and K for Kontrast /Black).

    These parameters are / do not need drugs.
    They are pure.

    Purity might be the solution … ?

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Wow! Amazing piece! I love it! I am a precise person too. I always make sure to punctuate and spell and use my grammar knowledge to my best abilities. Hehe.. Cheers! ✌🏻

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Pingback: 50 shades of grey areas – Site Title

  5. As long as a Skybot doesn’t win!

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Wow really, liked this post, will share!!!

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Watching cycling requires a lot of patience. Another question of interest. Do you like F1, motorsport something racing sports i mean?

    Liked by 3 people

    • It does indeed. No, not too interested in motorsports if I’m honest, especially F1 which I find revolves too much around things like tyre performance and on board gadgetry for my taste

      Liked by 1 person

      • Got it, yeah tyre performances and also mechanics’ skills affect the quality of race. ) Now, Tour De France goes on and i observe beautiful scenery during the road, wonderful trees, green color gives joy to the people

        Liked by 1 person

  8. I loved this! I’m not even a cycler, nor do I follow the sport, but it is such a perfect metaphor and so engaging, I had to read to the very end…hoping I get the go-ahead to keep my vision of all things grey. 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  9. As an avid cyclist and longtime fan of both the men’s and women’s peloton, there’s something to say about the chevalerie, the tradition, of the Tour. You want to beat the man because you’re the better cyclist, not because the guy had a mechanical. Granted, Froome et al didn’t wait for Tony Martin but they might not have been aware that he was able to get up after going down with Porte. Machismo is alive and well in Europe (you don’t often see that in the US) but I don’t think it will happen again to Froome.

    Liked by 3 people

    • I’m not too sure either way on that – on the one hand I like that they respect the yellow jersey, on the other I think that a big part of winning the race is getting around in one piece.

      Perhaps everyone should just race at all times and accept that riders have to cope with bad luck too?

      Liked by 1 person

  10. The whole doping issue has left me completely uninterested in cycling. It’s too hard to get excited about a race when it’s common knowledge that the leaders need to cheat to be competitive. This is a nice essay. Superbly written.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thanks, very kind!

      Understandable – personally I wouldn’t go so far as to say they need to cheat, there’s plenty of signs that the cheating is confined to a tiny minority.

      I find myself at least (if not more) suspicious about stars in other sports – boxing, NFL, UFC, golf, tennis, athletics…

      Cycling is far more open about this than it used to be.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Very engaging read!

    Liked by 2 people

  12. This is so me.!
    Please check out some of my words too.!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. I’m not an avid cycling watcher, but the meadow dookie is hysterical. Guess he should have worn a diaper according to the peleton.


  14. coreynasfell

    Well said! So much of my blogs dives into this very topic (a passionate subject for me)


  15. Pingback: Cycling needs to ban these things! – road|THEORY

  16. Pingback: Don’t judge me – road|THEORY

  17. Pingback: Chris Froome and the Ineos Twit-storm – road|THEORY

  18. Pingback: Vuelta Espana 2019 Stage 7: Valverde wins, too many @’s and #’s – road|THEORY

  19. Pingback: Goldilocks Shmoldilocks: it’s time to polarise! – road|THEORY

  20. Pingback: Doping royalty and the language of denial – road|THEORY

  21. Pingback: Meteorological doping – road|THEORY

  22. Pingback: Chris Froome and the COVID conspiracy – road|THEORY

  23. Pingback: Strade Bianche and other random events – road|THEORY

  24. Pingback: Tour de France 2021 Stage 18: Pog of the Pyrenees – road|THEORY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: