The 2015 pro-cycling season is over and there is no racing to talk about, which leaves a gaping chasm to fill in the cycling press.
Of course there are the usual transfer rumours, stories about disc brakes and electronic group sets, the weekly cyclist v motorist debate, and grand announcements from Oleg Tinkoff about what his star riders will be up to next season.
This is all fairly standard media coverage and fits into the category: โthereโs-no-racing-going-on-what-the-hell-should-we-talk-about?โ

(Image: Denismenchov08 via Wikimedia cc)
And then you get the next level โ what might be charitably called โcolumn fillerโ.
And so whilst idly flicking through my favourite cycling websites this week I came across a short and fairly insubstantial piece about what Bradley Wiggins has been wearing on his feet at the recent European Track Cycling Championships.
Some rather fancy bespoke carbon shoes, for the record.
Nothing wrong there, you might say, and who am I to criticise others for writing short and insubstantial pieces (perish the thought!). But that article was followed up by a second short and insubstantial piece about what Bradley Wiggins has been wearing on his feet.
Yes a second, completely separate article, published on the same day, but this time about socks. Or lack of them.
Is this two articles worth of cycling news? Is it even one article of cycling news? Might it just be a Tweetโs worth?
However, after a little more reflection I wonder if perhaps Iโm underestimating the impact of this news.
Iโm well aware of how strongly some cyclists feel about sock cuff length. Could it be that that Wiggins and Coโs choice to ride their bikes whilst not wearing any socks means we have something approaching a diplomatic incident on our hands? Apart from anything, a lot of cyclists have spent a lot of hard earned cash trying to up their โsock gameโ (as I believe itโs called) –ย rule number one of which is the gospel of 6 inch cuffs.
Where do we go from here?
Sir Bradley has long been an arbiter of cycling style, and now all that we once held as the immutable truth about sock cuff length may have been tossed aside in the course of a single track meet. Are we seriously considering making the jump from calf length cuffs to no cuffs at all?

(Image: R Kurtz via Flickr cc)
Have we run this past the committee?
We need some clarity. We need a ruling from the Velominati, and from Rapha, and we need to find out what David Millar thinks. This is all just so out of the blue!
OK, sorry, calm down, Iโve gone too far the other way now havenโt I?!
This is what happens, you see.
When thereโs no actual racing to talk about itโs easy to spiral out of control and lose a sense of perspective. Oh, and by the way, if you’ve no idea what I’m on about when it comes to permitted sock cuff height then well doneโฆthatโs to your credit!
One thing I did learn in all this media generated fluff is that there are a pair of cycling shoes out there on the open market which cost $2,000.
Aussie pro-cyclist and everyoneโs favourite consecutive Grand Tour completing hard-man Adam Hansen (13 and countingโฆ) has long been known for making his own carbon shoes, apparently moulding them with his bare hands to the exact contours of his feet.
Not only do these shoes make the claim to be lightest cycling shoes known to man (less than 96g, apparently), heโs now selling them on his own website for $2,000 dollars a pop.
I might slip a pair onto my Christmas list when no-oneโs looking, just to see. But hopefully before then, we can all get back to wearing socks of the appropriate length when weโre riding our bikes.
And then not long after that, with a bit of luck thereโll be some bike racing to talk about.
Six inches? Pretty soon they’ll be knee-length for God’s sake! I know of three and five inch lengths but I’m above average, height-wise and think the five’s are a touch too high… Now, for the record, this is height above the ankle, for those who may read this comment, not you of course, oh great one… Anywho, six is just too high.
Oh, and no socks looks stupid, even on the great Wiggle one. You ever roll up behind someone with no socks? He could be a freaking horse and you still think, “Noob.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
C’mon Jim, embrace the 6 inch cuffs, you never know till you try!! ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now THAT’S funny! Nice one brother.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve heard about that bike racing thing . . . .๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hehe, the bike racing is great, but it does get in the way of the fashion side of things sometimes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: We need to talk about Coppi | ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Weight watching with Wiggins | ragtime cyclist
Pingback: When is a cyclist not a cyclist | ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Primal screaming with Mark Cavendish | ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Pro Cycling Q&A 2017 – ragtime cyclist
Pingback: A lose-lose situation for Team Sky – ragtime cyclist
Pingback: In search of a sixty-mile tailwind – road|THEORY
Pingback: Peacock displays at the house of Wiggins – road|THEORY