Anyone with a passing interest in statistics, or Mark Twain, or even catchy one-liners for that matter, will have heard the phrase “lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
The implication is that, in the right hands and directed at the right audience, statistics can be used to add weight to any old half-baked argument. This is particularly appropriate here in the UK at the moment; we’re knee deep in the usual messy campaigning for the 2015 general election, and up to our necks in questionable facts and figures.
Suddenly, for a couple of months, the humble statistic is big news.
To put it another way, as 19th Century Scottish poet, novelist, and literary critic Andrew Lang observed, “Politicians use statistics in the same way that a drunk uses lamp posts – for support, rather than illumination.”
Luckily, I’m a man who likes a good stat. I’m also mildly obsessed with cycling in all its forms, and an interested observer in all this electioneering, so I’m very much the target audience once the cycling press gets around to analysing the voting habits of us cyclists; we’re a demographic all of our own these days, it seems.
Cycling Weekly have duly obliged with this piece about the fact that, as a group, we are more likely to vote for the Liberal Democrats than any other political party.
If I was being kind, I would say that this is because cyclists are the kind of people who like the idea of a fair, free and open society, where the values of liberty and equality are valued above all else. If I was being unkind, I might say it’s because we’re incapable of making up our minds on even the simplest of decisions (I think our friend “The Routemaster” might have a thing or two to say about that).
The article also describes cyclists as the most materialistic of all the exercise groups – well, I’m not sure how they came to that conclusion!
Rapha espresso set, anyone?
But no statistically related discussion of the habits of cyclists is complete without mention of the data-centric world of Strava.
I’ve written before – with a certain reverence – about those cyclists among us who will forever be the quality controllers: unconcerned with mileage, average speed and power output, and uninterested in the public free-for-all that is Strava – they exist only to extract the maximum amount of quality time from every bike ride. I’m certainly a man who appreciates that a beautiful country lane is more than just a chance to compete in the virtual world with a bunch of strangers, but if I’m honest I still can’t help myself.
When it comes to my own personal Strava stats, however, I have at least made a compromise: I’ve made a conscious decision not to measure things like power output, heart rate, cadence, or any other on-the-go parameter which might distract me, to the point where every bike ride becomes less about the riding of a bike down a beautiful country lane, and more an analysis of my (admittedly fairly average) physiology.
So where do those “lies, damned lies, and statistics” come into all this?
Well, I’ve come to the conclusion that beneath the shiny orange Strava branded veneer of a virtual level playing field, those leader-boards are surely equal parts athletic prowess, and prevailing wind conditions.
To put it another way; here in the north of Lancashire there are a huge number of very quick cyclists who push most of the top 10’s on a Strava leader-board beyond my grasp (I’ll settle for top 10%), but on the right day and with a 25mph tailwind…
No-one will ever know. It’s just “lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
Strava aside- ( I personal don’t have any issues with it or its users)
It can be all-consuming for sure, but like anything else, Balance and moderation is one of the keys to a healthy and content life.
I would argue that the term or descriptive “Liberal Democrats” no longer applies to a person who believes in absolute liberty, freedom and the idea of an open society. What that is, is a Libertarian or even an Anarchist or Voluntaryist. But NOT a liberal democrat or liberal republican for that matter.
Here in the U.S. the two parties are mostly made of Progressive National Socialists now. Kabuki Theater for the voting muppets. A true liberal society no longer exists, we live in a ‘soft’ Police State that is budding into a full-blown Police State. It’s a shame that so many ideologues are so entrenched to an archaic dogma, that ultimately renders them to being nothing more than a Statist.
Disraeli said it,btw…..
love the quote from Andrew Lang…so true
The Lang quote is a good one isn’t it. As far as I can tell the origin of the “lies..,” quote is up for debate – I mention Mark Twain because he famously attributed it to Disraeli. Either way…it’s a good ‘un
As if its not bad enough getting competitive with yourself. I often try to beat monthly mileage totals. Any strava competitiveness went out of my window when my pregnancy weight hit and I was super slow on the uphills. I made sure I put a note on about being full term and still riding… just so people understood why I was being so bobbins with times 😉
I think that’s fair enough, i can imagine those climbs are tough when you’re ‘riding for two!’ Hats off.
Easier to get local 10%s if you’re on them often rather than a one off segment? What, me a stat geek? Surely not?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The day job involves throwing cycling stats at policy makers in the hope that some common sense emerges.
So in the pedalling world I revel in being an ex-statto, long got rid of heart rate monitor, last time I did an annual mileage was 1985, use of GPS unit only to try and remember where the club run leader took me last week in case I ever want to go back there.
My cycling is far, far better for that and my life is in balance!
Sounds like you’ve well and truly thrown off the shackles!
Pingback: ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Shiny things and shark-fin saddles | ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Biking Behaviour (part 1) – the half wheeler – ragtime cyclist
Pingback: Biking Behaviour (part 14) – The Quality Controller – ragtime cyclist